Less wasted material. Better cutting plans.

Exploring practical ways to improve cutting-stock utilization, manage reusable offcuts, and simplify production planning for fabrication shops.

Independent optimization research Morris County, New Jersey

Share Your Experience

240 in stock length

Where Optimization Meets the Shop Floor

Primary focus

Cutting-Stock Optimization

Exploring more efficient cutting patterns for metal tubing, bar stock, aluminum extrusions, and other linear materials, accounting for stock lengths, saw kerf, reusable remnants, and multiple customer orders.

Figure 1. The same 4 orders, cut two ways

15 parts from 4 customer orders, cut from 20 ft bars.

Cut in the order received

Bar 152.552.539.7527.2552.514.875 inBar 239.7539.7527.256852.512.125 inBar 339.7527.256852.539.7512.125 in1BBCDB14.875 in2CCDAB12.125 in3CDABC12.125 in

3 bars. Scrap: 14.875, 12.125, 12.125 in. No offcut long enough to keep.

Planned as one set

Bar 152.539.7539.7539.7539.7527.250.5 inBar 252.552.552.552.527.252.125 inBar 3686839.7527.25remnant36.5 in1BCCCCD0.5 in2BBBBD2.125 in3AACD36.5 in

3 bars. Scrap: 0.5, 2.125 in. Kept for reuse: 36.5 in.

Both cutting plans use the same amount of stock. The difference is that planning across orders preserves one larger remnant that may be useful for a future job.

Parts ordered

  • A 68 in × 2
  • B 52.5 in × 5
  • C 39.75 in × 5
  • D 27.25 in × 3

Stock

240 in (20 ft)

Saw kerf

0.125 in per cut

Offcuts

  • Scrap, under 24 in
  • Remnant kept, 24 in or longer

Conceptual illustration — not actual production results.

Related areas

Secondary focus

Material Waste & Remnant Reuse

Investigating how shops manage leftover material and whether practical optimization could improve material utilization beyond existing workflows.

Exploratory

Production Scheduling

Exploring how shops coordinate machine availability, setup times, urgent jobs, and delivery deadlines when planning becomes difficult.

About the Researcher

I’m Greg, the independent researcher behind Applied Ops Lab, based in Morris County, New Jersey.

I’m interested in how mathematical optimization can address practical manufacturing problems—particularly cutting plans, reusable material, and production constraints.

Right now, I’m learning from local fabrication shops about the planning challenges that existing software doesn’t fully address.

Does Your Shop Still Adjust Cutting Plans Manually?

I’m speaking with local fabrication professionals to understand how they handle multiple orders, different stock lengths, and reusable offcuts.

Does your cutting software handle these situations well, or are there still cases where someone on the shop floor finds a better arrangement?

I’d welcome a brief exchange—no sales pitch, just a practical conversation about what works and what doesn’t.

Send an Email

Or write directly to greg@appliedopslab.com